What's it about: The TARDIS lands in the cargo hold of luxury space cruiser the Moray Rose. The crew and passengers are missing. The agents of Inter-Galaxy Insurance are determined to find out what’s happened and the shadowy Interplanetary Police Inspector Efendi is showing a very particular interest. Caught up in all this, the Doctor and Leela find themselves facing a horde of metal mantis-like aliens. But throughout it all, Leela is haunted by terrible nightmares and the dawning realization that everything she knows about her life is a lie.
Teeth and Curls: He's going to solve the mystery of the Moray
Rose because he has nothing better to do this morning. Where I find Briggs'
handling of Leela to be a little vague and unsure he seems to be getting much
better at giving Baker's Doctor some witty and colourful dialogue. I loved his
overly complicated explanation of how he knows he way around the ship, secret
passages and all ('Leonard who was known to be a grog-lover but he also
loved cats too...'). For all his guile the Doctor is no match for a born
killer. Clearly he doesn't trust Leela to not avail herself of Janis thorns
again because he has knocked up a batch of the antidote in the TARDIS
laboratory. Lucky for him otherwise he would be a dead man. That angry streak
to his character emerges again, this time sending the hypnotising pulse back to
attack the aliens and leave them all out cold. He's something of an avenging
angel this season, vicious with his enemies. Perhaps that should be commented
on. The Doctor asking Leela about her father and stopping to listen is a
welcome moment. He is trying to understand her better.
Noble Savage: On the surface this is exactly what the 4DAs
should be doing, looking at the regulars backstory's and using them to explore
the characters further. It's been done very effectively with the regulars
throughout the 80s in other Big Finish productions over the years; Nyssa (Spare
Parts, Creatures of Beauty), Peri (& the Piscon Paradox, The Reaping),
Turlough (Loups-Garoux) and Ace (The Settling, Afterlife). After playing it
pretty safe throughout the first two season of 4DAs (with the exception of the
probing Wrath of the Iceni), it appears that the writers are finally starting
to shake things up a bit, drop the ultra traditional angle and explore the
relationship of the Doctor and Leela a little more. When I read the synopsis of
The Evil One I was quite excited. Could this be another Creatures of Beauty for
Nick Briggs and a return to form after being the safest pair of hands in this
range since its inception? Unfortunately not. Probing Leela by looking at her
relationship with her father and comparing that to her relationship with the
Doctor is a great idea in theory but it written so cack-handedly and with
little to actually say on the subject I wonder why they even bothered to bring
it up. This is characterisation, but it's scraps rather than anything meaty and
searching. Leela is being persuaded to doubt herself and her role in her
fathers death but the story never stops to ask why she should have an issue
with that. Death is a way of life amongst her tribe and a reality that Leela
has never shied away from the reality of. Was her relationship with her father
an fractious one? Did she secretly want him out of the way? Did he stunt her
growth? Did she live in his shadow and was she afraid to step out of it once he
was gone? There are so many fascinating things we could learn about this most
unusual of father/daughter relationships and the story never dares to shine a
light on it at all. Why would Leela not tell the Doctor the truth about her
troubling nightmares about her father? She is rarely as reticent about anything,
least of all her fears. How rubbish is the concept that Leela has been an agent
of Xoanon all this time? A sleeper agent unaware of her real instructions - to
kill the Doctor! Louise Jameson tries her best to make this material work,
spitting out threats to the Doctor as though she might rip his head off and
shit down his neck but she's fighting a losing battle. 'I am the Evil One
and you are dead!' How can you find the shades in dialogue like that? There
is an attempt to provide a summary on Leela's experiences in this story at the
climax but it pretty much boils down to 'I am stupid because the Master
hypnotised me.' Her father meant a lot to her and he died because of her
and her foolish words. The greatest revelation that The Evil One bestows upon is
that Leela is her fathers daughter. Big woo.
The Scabby One: I wonder if the Master sits in his TARDIS
with a ruddy great sheet of paper and writes out all of his ridiculous schemes
to try and bring down the Doctor. A bit like the Meddling Monk and his 'to do'
list. And then he ticks them off one by one as they are all crushed. What he
needs is somebody to look over his shoulder and point out all the flaws - a bit
like the way that Big Finish is in need of script editor who receives a script
like this and tells the writer to go away and try again. This week his plan is
to convince Leela via various hypnotic, dream-like suggestions that he is the
great Xoanon that she has been working for all these years and that she is the
Evil One who needs to murder the Doctor. Yeah, you read that correctly. If this
was played for laughs it might just work. Let's be honest it is hardly his most
insane plot - that probable sees him dressed as a fat genie screaming 'SHALOM!
PESHWARI NAAN!' into a crystal ball or hanging out as a scarecrow for
months during the Industrial Revolution. But it's pretty high up there in the
desperation stakes all the same. Are his machinations so predictable that the
Doctor can sniff him out a mile off like he does here? Tom Baker effects no surprise
whatsoever during his reveal, only mild disdain. Perhaps he was picking up on
the feelings of the audience. 'Rather a lame attempt at subterfuge, wasn't
it? What ill fated scheme are you plotting now?' For my money Beevers appearance in Joe Lidster's Master is still
his shining Big Finish moment and most interesting interpretation (Lidster
attempted to do something fresh with the character rather than rely on his
pantomimic villainy) and all of his appearances in the 4DAs (the nonsensical
Kraal four parter, The Light at the End and this), while fun on a superficial
level, have been a complete waste of the character. He's not being used because
there is a reason to do so to advance his character, it is because his
appearance drives sales. Beevers is as silky smooth and seductive as ever but
the characterisation is hollow. Why does he want to kill the Doctor? Why make
it so personal by making Leela the instrument? 'Your hatred of the Doctor
consumes you! All you wish for is revenge!' But why? It's no use
telling us what we already know if you aren't going to dig beneath the surface
and explain why or reveal something new. Instead he gets to say 'OBEY
ME!' quite a lot. That's novel. His plan was flawed from the start because
Leela was always strong enough to break the conditioning. The Doctor could see
that...so why couldn't his foe?
Great Ideas: The crew of the Moray Rose reduced to a
powdery residue. Nasty.
Audio Landscape: Jungle sounds, the Horda creatures,
screams, glass smashing, the hydraulics of metal spiders scuttling about the
ship, cocking a gun, robotic limbs, alarms, hypnotic signal.
Musical Cues: All praise to Jamie Robertson (sounds like I
have joined a Following style cult devoted to the sound engineer and musician)
without whom this might have been an intolerably traditional yomp around a
spaceship. It most certainly is little more than a jaunt about the Moray Rose
but with Robertson at the helm it skips by very pleasantly with some pacy music
that ensures terrific momentum and sound effects that plant you straight into
the action. I particularly liked the dramatic use of the xylophone. Very
Dudley Simpson. The soft, hypnotic music that ensnares Leela is subdued and
really effective, it nearly lulled me into a dreamlike state.
Isn't it Odd: You can't say that
Briggs doesn't capture the theatrical and artificiality of the opening scenes
of The Face of Evil to a tee...it opens beat for beat in exactly the same
style. Whether that is a good thing or not depends on whether you like your
Doctor Who being played ridiculously stagy or not. How did the Master meet up
with these aliens? Why don't we learn anything about them beyond what the plot
needs to give us to explain Leela's brainwashing? In the extra features it
becomes apparent that the return of old monsters in the 4DAs is simply a
marketing ploy rather than a storytelling necessity. David Richardson comments
that he wanted a Master story and Nick Briggs comments that he wanted to write
the story and struggled to come up with for it without copying something that
was already done before. Which means there is no narrative reason to bring
these old monsters back - it isn't because somebody had a fantastic way
to innovate them. I think this absolutely the worst way to approach
storytelling - wouldn't it be cool if so and so was brought in...oh shit now
we have to find an idea to make it work. The idea should come first and the
cheap marketing ploy afterwards. Sorry if that sounds overtly negative but it
might go some way to explaining why critical reception of the first two series
of 4DAs was mixed.
Result: How seriously can you take a story that can be
summed up with: Leela is hypnotised by the Master to murder the Doctor. If that
doesn't sound like the most appalling fanwank imaginable then I don't know what
does. Even so, if you were a writer of terrific dexterity and intricacy you
might be able to pull this off, abandoning the shows adventurous roots and
going for something insanely dark and psychologically destabilising for the
characters. Like having Leela beat the Doctor beyond recognition in her insane
lust for his death and having to deal with consequences. Or the most stalwart
of Doctor's being genuinely frightened of a supposed ally. Or Leela
examining a disturbed relationship with her father. Instead this is a typical
Nick Briggs script in the 4DA range with lots of running about and talking
plot, very little substance and personality. It does try and pretend that it
has something profound to say about Leela by linking her brainwashing trigger
to the death of her father but it doesn't bother to scrutinize her relationship
with him or explicate why his death might weight heavy on her mind in any great
depth. Instead it's just a plot device, a way of flipping a switch and turning
Leela from noble savage to mindless killer. On the basic level of sticking on a
Big Finish story and being swept away for an hour of casual frolics with the
Doctor, Leela and the Master this is enjoyable enough (I was certainly never
bored...incredulous but never bored) but don't go in expecting anything
revelatory because you will be sorely disappointed. I remember a time when
Briggs conjured up an insidious and dark character drama that pushed the
regulars to the edge and featured an astonishingly vivid guest cast. It was
called Creatures of Beauty. This had the potential to be as hard hitting and
unforgettable as that story but somewhere along the way Briggs has lost his
nerve. Tidy, traditional, inconsequential - pick an adjective: 5/10 (I
wanted to score one lower for being so unambitious but the production is too
good to punish it like that - all praise Jamie Robertson!)
Crap, I knew as soon as I saw the phrases "Master" and "Nicholas Briggs" together on the Big Finish home page that this was going to be exactly what it has turned out to be judging by my most trusted reviewers. Pity - unlike my cherry-picking from seasons 1 and 2, I was actually considering buying Season 3 as one batch if it turned out alright - which I still might if the rest are awesome, but considering Briggs is also writing stories featuring a) the latest Big Finish marketing ploy and b) another return of an old monster, I highly doubt that I will. Maybe season four will be better...ah screw it.
ReplyDelete