This story in a nutshell: We've seen it all before, but
quite stylish nonetheless...
Indefinable: I can't quite get enough of this Doctor. It's
not exactly the way he is written (which is pretty well most of the time) but
more how Capaldi chooses to interpret the material. He's magnetic, even in
adventures as stereotypical as this. Or perhaps especially in adventures as
stereotypical as this because he adds a whole new layer to a story that has
been told before. The way he strokes the TARDIS and asks what is wrong with her
gave me flashbacks to so many other moments with previous Doctor's. At moments
like that you can genuinely believe they are the same man. I laughed out loud
at the Doctor's arrogance in attempting to communicate with O'Donnell without
the help of her translator only to walk away with egg on his face. He's such a
tool sometimes. Capaldi has the perfect face to gnash his teeth and declare
that there are ghosts on the base...let's be honest his face is frightening
enough to put the willies up kids if lit dramatically enough. Clara giving him
little cards that prompt him to be nice is a pleasing reminder of the grumpy
bastard he was last year and tugged at my mouth. He flies around the Drum,
spectral and alien and loving every second of this supernatural investigation.
He's electrifyingly good.
Impossible Girl: I thought this was where we would be at the
beginning of the season with the Doctor and Clara going off on adventures in
the TARDIS without all this yo-yoing back to Earth every week. It's what I have
been asking for ever seen she first stepped into the TARDIS. And it's still not
clicking for me. With her leaving soon it feels like too little, too late and
especially with Clara being so meta and self aware of her role all the time.
Stop banging on about looking for adventures and just have one already. This
season I have barely seen her break a sweat. I always go back to my default
companion in these situations, Elisabeth Sladen's divine Sarah Jane Smith. She
would absolutely rock in this adventure, standing up to the Doctor's spikiness,
sympathetic towards the crew and most importantly she would be absolutely
terrified of the ghosts without me losing an ounce of respect for the
character. Clara is just too confident in her abilities (without having much
ability) to be believable or even that likable. I want a companion who is a
little less faux emancipated and a little more real next time. Somebody made a
fascinating comment recently about Moffat having real difficulty bringing women
to life with any great success but having a lot more luck with his male
characters. They are allowed to be more flawed, more emotional and
(paradoxically) weaker which makes them much stronger overall and easier to buy
into. I'm hoping for a male companion next time around.
The Good:
* Some locations manage to excite just by their very nature
and I love the idea of setting a story on a Sea Base. Mind you we all know how
that worked out last time, don't we? So I guess Moffat knows exactly what kind
of pitfalls to ignore. I guess Lake Base would be more accurate but that
doesn't sound half as exciting. A creepy flooded village and an apparently
abandoned base. It's ripe for the Doctor to turn up and investigate. We've seen
disaster movie Who before but that doesn't stop the water breaking into the
Drum any less exciting. It comes at just the right point as well, leading up to
the cliffhanger and when the episode has started to get a little too chatty for
it's own good.
* Not to criticise the performances that have laced the
previous four seasons but this is finest assembled guest cast for the series
since the last outstanding stab at a base under siege story, The Waters of
Mars. There's something about the formula that brings the best out of the guest
cast, the claustrophobia hangs around their necks and allows for them to truly
show their true colours. It's certainly the first time in an age where the
collective guest cast has left an impression on me. I had Pritchard down as the
villain of the piece, given his attempts to claim everything as his own. It
genuinely surprised me when he was the first one for the chop. O'Donnell is
sweet in the same way Shona was in Last Christmas; spunky, lively and ready for
anything. You can tell there is a little love between some of these characters
thanks to some subtle work done by the actors, I hope it is explored in more
depth in episode two.
* Let's stand back for a moment and bask in the joy of
having a disabled character making such an impression on the story and for sign
language and the very nature of deafness to be part of the fabric of the plot
itself. For Doctor Who this is a genuine innovation.
* Ghosts have never put the willies up me because I have
never really bought into the idea of them existing in the first place, despite
seeing some horror movies that have tried painfully hard to scare the shit out
of me with the idea. My mother is a firm believer and I was surrounded by
people in my childhood who not only believed in the notion of the afterlife but
would form circles and try and contact people on the other side. So the idea of
spirits is one that has been with me and part of my life for a long time.
Doctor Who's stab at ghost stories in the past have been right up my street,
offering up supposed manifestations of the dead and then giving a rational
explanation for their appearance. Time travellers from the future. Time
travellers trapped in the past. A woman caught in a moment in time. Doctor Who
often enjoys de-bunking myths and offering a creative explanation as t how they
came about in the first place...which makes this quite a novel experience when
the ghosts in Under the Lake turn out to be the real McCoy. Visually they are
rather creepy with their dark staring eyes, penchant or picking up solid
weapons and attacking and pursuing people through the empty corridors of the
Drum. I just hope there is a really explanation for their manifestation in the
next episode otherwise the show is simply putting out there that peoples
spirits can turn malevolent, substantial and be directed for the hell of it.
Although it has to be said that the ghosts were properly scary at points and it
is worth their inclusion for that reason alone. The black penetrating eyes,
silent words and their ability to turn up unexpectedly and menace you makes
them one of the better examples of spectral phenomena I have seen in fantasy
for a while.* I am still completely in love with that version TARDIS console room. If they dare to change it I might just go all Ian Levine and smash my telly.
* What a cliffhanger, what a clever notion. We've never
really seen this sort of thing done before which makes it quite exciting. The
Doctor spending one episode in a single location and then heading back in time
to before it became that way and potentially making it happen. This appears to
be a portent of his death, which might have excited me more had the idea not been
flogged to death in series six. But the moment itself is chilling and the image
of Capaldi floating through the murky water with black, soulless eyes is burnt
into my memory. Please, please, please don't let this be a cheat.
The Bad:
* Self conscious dialogue. I'm beyond weary of it now. Half
the time it feels like the regulars know that they are taking part in a Doctor
Who adventure and feel the need to comment on it all the time. The Doctor's 'I
want to kiss it to death' is a particularly gruelling example. For those of you
who think I am a Russell T. Davies apologist I admit it sprung into life with a
vengeance during his era (all that 'I'm the Doctor from Gallifrey and I can
save the entire universe whilst sipping a cup of tea' nonsense) but with clever
clever Moffat behind the wheel this post-modern madness has been taken to the
next level. I'm not entirely what the scene in the TARDIS between the Doctor
and Clara was all about, I think it was supposed to show some signs of
development but it's meaning was lost on me. Except for the fact that it was
entirely self-conscious again.
* I'm one of those irritating people who cannot help himself
but compare what is being brought out now to what has gone before. It's an
annoying quirk of my reviews but if I have seen the show deliver the same thing
before but better, I will comment on it. The untranslatable alien writing was
very reminiscent of The Impossible Planet but not quite as effective because it
has been done before. First time out it felt mysterious and compelling, this
was just another cog in the plot. Death at a push of a button with the killer
and the victim with glass between them was much more chilling in the series two
adventure as well. A base flooding with water? The Waters of Mars. Ghosts that
turn out to be more than just supernatural phenomena? Army of Ghosts. The
Doctor and his companion on either side of a porthole with him promising to
return for her? 42. I'm not saying these things are handled badly here (far
from it, the direction is excellent) but Whithouse has assembled much of his
story from material seen elsewhere in the new series.
* Forgive me because I have just banged on about how the
show can be a little too literal in the discussion of its genre but isn't the
distress call that this creature sends out far too complex for it's own good.
Creating ghosts who mouth words that require experts of the cryptic crossword
to interpret seems a little convoluted when he could just have them say
'co-ordinates blah blah blah, come fine me' or just 'Fisher King in trouble,
send help.' Frankly I wouldn't be at all surprised if nobody ever came after
the Fisher King because his distress signal was far too florid for it's own
good. 'What ever happened to that great hulking monster The Fisher King?' 'God
knows...but we received a sting of godawful poetry from that sector a few weeks
later...something about an arrow and a church. We never went looking, probably
a bunch of talentless playwrights in trouble.' Mind you of course without the
cry for help being quite this puzzling (essentially the ghosts and the
exposition around them) this episode would be about ten minutes long. Is this
the only episode that relies on the monster being a bit flamboyant in his SOS
to give it substance?
The Shallow Bit: Lunn with the enormous eyebrows and
lickable skin.
Result: Derivative, but pacy and full of mysteries and
realised within an inch of it's life. Whilst I was watching Under the Lake I
was fully aware that we had seen all of this done before (the recipe is
basically every base under siege story ever told with extra lashings of The Impossible
Planet, The Waters of Mars and Cold War) but that didn't stop me enjoying what
was essentially a firm meat and potatoes slice of Doctor Who that doesn't
really put a foot wrong in its realisation. Simon made me realise something
whilst we were watching together - this is essentially an extremely long winded
way of putting across a piece of information that could have been dealt with in
the pre-titles sequence (that the ghosts are a distress call for whatever is
trapped on the sea bed) but the extra time allows us to build up some
atmosphere, get to know the crew, let Capaldi do his thing and enjoy some
spooky moments. Us Doctor Who fans like nothing more than a lot of exciting
running around, a few mysteries and a good, creepy cliffhanger. What Under the
Lake has in spades is a great deal of potential to wind up being a hugely
satisfying two part story, all the elements are in place for the second episode
to deliver a massive punch. More than ever since the show returned to our
screens in 2005 the show is being made for it's fans, which is why you can hear
the cry of delight from that quarter whilst the viewing figures from the
abandoning audience at large are at an all time low. Whithouse's strongest?
Let's wait until next weeks episode to determine that (the trailer looks
awesome, it reminded me of the outstanding Doctor Who novel City of the Dead in
some ways) but at the moment it sits way above The Vampires of Venice and but
below School Reunion (which still makes me cry), The God Complex (which is one
of my favourites from series six) and A Town Called Mercy (despite its
reputation I still love it). What all these episodes prove is that Whithouse is
an extremely versatile writer within the Doctor Who format and is foremost in
my mind as a possibility for showrunner. His understanding of nuts and bolts
Doctor Who with a little extra spice in Under the Lake is another notch on his
belt: 7/10
"I'm hoping for a male companion next time around."
ReplyDeleteKeep waiting.
I know Billie put it quite eloquently that there is something gorgeous about the Doctor traveling with a wife-y sort of companion. But it's been done.
To death.
And I *know* Moffat realises this. The show peaked with River and Donna, and no combinations of tics and girl-power and sly winks to the camera will keep it fresh.
If anything Clara has seen a downgrade in independence. Remember when she was the one wrinkle the Doctor couldn't figure out? Then she became his cosmic guardian angel or something, which I was onboard with. Then we got River Redux, and now Amy Redux... We have regressed.
Bring on a male companion. Bring on a Female Doctor. Give me something to work with, DW.
Joe, you know that the Rugby World Cup is the cause of the low ratings? For Series 9 it is much higher than the previous one, especially without Danny Pink. And to be honest, television is a half-dead since the Internet exists.
ReplyDeleteI don't want to imagine a female Doctor in Moffat's hands... I'm not totally against the concept if done properly but... A female, shallow and flirty Doctor brought by Moffat... *shudder* It would be the only incarnation of the Doctor that I might truly dislike.
ReplyDeleteTotally agree with a male companion for 12...
You know, I don't think anyone complains about Renette or Sally Sparrow. Not all of Moffat's female characters are the flirty sort. Missy certainly doesn't qualify (though she does have Moffat's trademark bawdiness.) I'm not saying he doesn't have a tendency to make characters in that mold, but it's not the only sort of woman he writes.
ReplyDeleteMoffat has stated that his conception of the Doctor is a sort of mad, older uncle ("You wouldn't have a young Santa Clause, would you?") so I imagine that he'd portray a female Doctor as a sort of mad, older aunt.
It would be interesting a female Doctor if she was some sort of Docorish Evelyn Smythe. But not a young smug flirty woman (River Song anyone?)
ReplyDeleteSarah Jane was as vanilla as companion could get
ReplyDeletewhat's interesting there