In the wizards camp you have Scott Haran as Tom Clarke – a
Harry Potter wanabee in that he is an emerging wizard who has lost his mother
under dramatic circumstances. Not a bad little actor but a perhaps a little too
sensitive considering his masculine nature is referred to in the script quite a
few times. Likeable, but not developed as much I would like. There’s not a
great deal of difference between the Tom of the opener and the Tom of the
finale besides his friendship with Benny and his opinion of one of the Nekross.
Percelle Ascot as Benny Sherwood is slightly wooden to begin with, as though he
has trouble saying his dialogue naturalistically (but then so did Daniel
Radcliffe at first and look how well that turned out). Dressed to look younger
than he is and given the most hideous specker glasses, Ascot is strangely the
better looking of the two. Goes on a much more interesting journey than Tom and
is far easier to sympathise with (everyone loves the downtrodden character). Finds
his confidence and reveals his ability far more than the central character.
Micheal Clarke is a forgettable character and yet at the
same time the character who surprises me the most because of it. He’s pushed to
the background more often than not (in a way that the Sarah Jane Adventures was
equally child and adult oriented, this show is far more involved with the
kiddywinks) but Higgs is clearly a very capable actor and when given the right
material delivers in spades. He needs more screen time. On the other hand
Annette Badland as Ursula Crowe is by a whisker the best character and proof if
it was needed why an adult presence is desperately needed in this series. She’s
everything that the scripts want her to be; funny, scary and a bit batty. I love
how she can swing from being a forgettable old crow to a formidable witch in
the blink of an eye. Again the stories aren’t necessarily about her but when
she is given the chance to stand out (Fall of the Nekross) she wipes all the
characters off the screen. At first I thought Randall Moon was the weakest
character and the reason this felt much more immature than its predecessor but
continued exposure proved that his presence was well judged and he showed more
potential than simply a comedy hobgoblin his initial appearance suggested.
Starkey is an actor of no small talents and he inhabits this creature with a
great deal of believability, even if the makeup lets him down slightly.
On the side of the aliens you have Brian Blessed as the
Nekross King, an irritatingly awful special effect and a standard, one note
villain. Blessed deserves much more, he’s an incredible actor. My gut reaction
was that Lexi she was going to be the weakest character after Dawn of the
Nekross pushed her brother centre stage but somewhere around the middle of the
season she became my favourite, just edging out Ursula. Of everybody she goes
on the most interesting journey and by the end of the season you don’t know if
she is ally or enemy and it’s a kind of ambiguity that you wont really find
anywhere else in the show. Christie, hot from the second season of Game of
Thrones, let’s rip once she is inside the mask which affords her the
opportunity to show surprising depths and underplay the role the further we
greater understand the character. Only in the last story does she disappoint,
Phil Ford seemingly wiping away all of her development by simply ignoring it. I
loved how Varg started out with such confidence and by the end of the season he
has been completely castrated by his father. It reminds me strongly of the
journey that Crais goes on in the first series of Farscape, going from a
standard, one-note villain to a more sympathetic victim in a short space of
time. It might not have escaped your attention that I found the aliens far more
interesting than the wizards. I’m as surprised as you are.
Its natural to make comparisons between The Sarah Jane
Adventures and Wizards vs Aliens and I have to say I found the new show wanting
in this respect. Its perfectly acceptable on its own terms but it doesn’t quite
match up to the consistent quality of its predecessor. The storylines aren’t
quite as involving and the overall look of the show isn’t quite as polished
(but then they can’t dust down old Doctor Who costumes and props like the other
show could). What I did find when thinking about the two shows was that Wizards
vs Aliens lacked a strong adult presence which Elisabeth Sladen brought to the
show and as a result this felt far more geared towards young children rather
than a family audience. One thing that always impressed me about SJA was how
innovative the scripts were right through to the climax, aside from one
adventure each Wizards vs Alien script of the first season had a far superior
opening installment than closing one.
Dawn of the Nekross: A bit uninspiring and feeling like too
much is thrown at you too quickly, this is actually a rather messy introductory
story. Phil Ford is capable of terrific character work but his handling of the
regulars feels overly simplistic and the story hops from one set piece to
another with little in the way of an engaging narrative to string it all
together. There’s nothing that feels particularly original here, the core of
the show seeming to be inspired from a mixture of Harry Potter and Doctor
Who. The sequence with the car in space is a highlight and should be the
sort of set piece this show should be aspiring too but more often than not
we’re cutting to the rather embarrassing Nekross King which blows any
credibility for the series out the water. I wasn’t convince of this series’
potential by the conclusion and that wasn’t a great place to start. And it
might be fatuous of me to say but that is the gayest looking magical fairy dust
I have ever seen: 4/10
Grazlax Attacks: Better, if not perfect. Watching this I
began to see the chemistry emerging between Haran and Ascott it made perfect
sense to give them an adventure on their own. It develops in surprising ways (I
never thought they would destroy Benny’s house in such a unsalvageable way and
Ursula’s kiddie friendly spells going awry to restore the place to its factory
settings was delightful) although if you’ve seen Gremlins there is very
little that is original. It’s a fun action tale with nothing deep going on
(which makes that two for two in the respect), this is only really let down
significantly by the horrendous realisation of the Grazlax itself. A marketing
opportunity hitting the screen, me thinks, but more suited to a childs bedroom
than on screen because they lack any sense of realism whatsoever. SJA never
suffered production values quite this poor: 6/10
Rebel Magic: Along comes Joe Lidster to salvage the show and
explore the potential in the central characters of Tom and Benny. Lidster has a
way writing sophisticated scripts without making things incomprehensible for
the kids which I really like. His strengths are thematic depth and strong
characterisation and both are very much in evidence here. Responding to the
mature writing, the direction is suddenly far darker and much more watchable. Whilst
Jackson Hawke’s storyline is mapped out thanks to the flashbacks which hint at
the twist long before it is revealed, the actor chosen to play the part is very
strong and he injects a great deal of subtle menace into the way he bewitches
Tom. The only story of the season where the climax didn’t let me down, this one
played out unpredictably throughout and was one of the highlights of the
season: 8/10
Friend or Foe: A superb first part which had great fun with
developing Lexi and pushing her into a spanking new role and was only let down
by a slightly underwhelming conclusion that runs on the spot rather than
continuing to innovate. Gaunt is initially intriguing but ultimately little
more than a pantomime villain that is nowhere near as effective as she is
painted. Strong direction again and it was around the first cliffhanger where
things were getting really interesting (hero and villain captured and suffering
an equal fate) that I saw how the serialised nature of the show could be used
to its advantage. A terrific chance to do something different with the Nekross
and push the central storyline of their incursion on the planet into a far more
interesting direction: 7/10
Fall of the Nekross: The highlight of the first season by a
country mile and an enthralling piece of storytelling from Gareth Roberts. How
he turns the Nekross, one of the most exaggerated alien races to grace my
television screen into victims that I was concerned about is inspired and
pushing Benny centre stage means that he is given a great deal of strong,
dramatic maturity. Joss Agnew’s direction is second to none and he ensures the
destruction that the Nekross face looks absolutely genuine and the whole notion
of the compute virus gone awry is brilliantly conceived and even more impressively
realised (that smiley face is strangely menacing). In the second part I really
appreciated the conflict between Ursula (who is deeply unsympathetic and
therefore so much more interesting than anybody else) and Benny because its
exactly the sort of moral ambiguity that the show has been lacking to this
point, plumping instead for grand adventure. This wasn’t perfect (the alliance
between the Nekross and humanity is nowhere near as effectively handled as it
was in Friend or Foe) but its as close as season one gets: 9/10
The Last Day: As the first story was underwhelming, thus the
finale suffers the same fate. Season one of SJA climaxed on The Lost Boy also
by Phil Ford which married the epic (a terrific multi layered plot that saw two
sets of villains emerge) and the emotional (Sarah Jane losing Luke and all the
drama that surrounded that). In comparison this is flaccid stuff, making a meal
out of the return of Tom’s mum because it hasn’t really been explored enough to
warrant the emotional investment the script expects us to make in her
appearance. Its clear from the off that something is fishy about the whole set
up and the concept of cloning the woman guts the story of any sincerity,
choosing to go for something quirky rather than giving the story a quiet
honesty. By suggesting that she is dead and embodying a clone with her essence,
it feels like the show is trying to have its cake and eat it and that isn’t
dramatically satisfying. With clones of a regular characters long lost relation
wandering about, this had a peculiar air of The X-Files. Haran is
fantastic here, his best performance of the year but the rest of the cast is
barely given a chance to impress. Ford is easily the shows weakest writer and
it seems a pity that he should be its most prolific. One great script a year
would be much preferable to three average ones. There’s the odd moment of
stinging emotion that sweetens the pill: 5/10
No comments:
Post a Comment